Crito is of the Crito argument Crito argument it would not be wrong for Socrates to escape because he has been imprisoned unjustly. All of this, Socrates tells Crito, is the voice that he seems to hear murmuring in his ears and that prevents him from hearing anything else. If I escape, then I will break an agreement I made with the city.
After Crito has admitted that this is Crito argument, the question is raised concerning whose opinion should be regarded seriously enough to be followed.
Socrates says that the meaning of this is perfectly clear - it will be three days until he dies. If Socrates were to break from prison now, having so consistently validated the social contract, he would be making himself an outlaw who would not be welcome in any other civilized state for the rest of his life.
The brief reference to his dream is an example of the popular belief that events may be foretold in that manner. We cannot be certain about what he would have done under these circumstances, but there is one important difference between Plato and Socrates at the time when the conversation with Crito took place: In his second argument, Crito speculates about why Socrates does not want to escape.
He is choosing the "easiest path" as opposed to the courageous, honorable, and virtuous path, which Crito feels is to flee from certain, unjust death.
This argument is very narrow. He says that Crito overlooks the possibility that his friends would be both willing and capable of bringing his children up. It can be right if it is based on actual facts and what can logically be inferred from them. He holds that it is not life but a good life that is to be valued above everything else.
Would it be Right to disobey the laws to escape from jail without official discharge? Acting in harmony with this voice, he was accustomed to do what he believed was right, and he would not depart from this course in order to save his own life.
Then, turning to us, he said, How charming the man is: May I, or not? For this reason, Crito tells Socrates that tomorrow will be his last day alive. It will be supposed by those who are not familiar with the facts that Crito could have purchased the freedom of his friend by paying a certain amount of money but that he refused to do so.
If Socrates is hesitant about making his escape because he fears that such an action on his part would get his friends into trouble, Crito reminds him that he need Crito argument no such fear, for with a small amount of money that his friends would be happy to contribute, they could buy off the informers who would report to the authorities concerning his escape.
Socrates has made an effective reply to the arguments advanced by Crito, stating at some length his reasons for believing that it would be Crito argument for him to escape.
He has been portrayed as a religious man who has spent the greater portion of his life in obedience to what he regarded as a divine command. By living in the state for these many years and accepting the benefits it has provided, he has indicated a willingness to accept Crito argument laws and regulations and to abide by the decisions of its courts, regardless of what those decisions might be.
In addition, they would argue that anyone who is a subverter of the laws would also be a corrupter of the young and foolish portion of humanity. I will argue that Socrates has the stronger arguments. If Socrates escapes he will break his agreement to obey the laws. Such a person does not pay attention to the advice of the general public, but to his trainer.
The question was whether or not one is morally obligated to obey laws that are believed to be unjust. By refusing to escape, you will be taking the easier but not the better and manlier part, and, therefore, people will be ashamed not only of you but also of your friends, who they will maintain were lacking in the necessary courage to save you from an untimely death.
And now you have forgotten these fine sentiments, and pay no respect to us the laws, of whom you are the destroyer; and are doing only what a miserable slave would do, running away and turning your back upon the compacts and agreements which you made as a citizen.
Whatever it does is largely a matter of chance. In this instance, it proved to be correct. A quite different view was held by those who believed that the proper function of punishment was to enable society to get even with the criminal by inflicting upon him an evil that was equivalent to the one he had caused others to suffer.
One reason that Crito advances is based chiefly on what he anticipates people will say in the event that Socrates remains in prison and is put to death. Such accusations could only add to the grief that Crito would already have experienced in the loss of a friend who could never be replaced.
Please then to do as I say, and not to refuse me. Also, while it may be possible to pay people off, there is still the question of whether it is moral. He will relate what he imagines the many, or people in general, will say if he does escape from prison and go to some foreign land to spend the remainder of his life.
I understand, he said:This lesson focuses on the Crito, in which Socrates argues against the idea that he should escape the penalty of death imposed on him by Athens, laying the groundwork for future debates over the rights of the individual and the rule of law.
Students read the dialogue and analyze its arguments in. After undermining Crito’s appeal to the opinion of the many, Socrates starts the central argument of the dialogue.
Socrates emphasizes that what follows might not be acceptable to the many – this claim explains in retrospective the importance of arguing against the relevance/importance of the majority’s opinion. Crito Argument Shakee G.
Philbert Ashford University Tanya Martin May 4, Crito is a dialog set in an Athenian prison. It takes place after the trial of. And note also how Crito's own opinion changed during the course of the argument. What consequences might this have for "dialogues" concerning right and wrong?
In the Phaedo, Plato tells of a last dialogue by Socrates. In this paper I will be analyzing Crito in the aspects of context, main issues, Socratic reversal, athlete/physician analogy and the consequences. The first two are fairly weak. The third, concerning Socrates’ responsibility to his children is the strongest.
Crito presents many reasons to Socrates. This sample paper was composed by Anne Farrell. TO ESCAPE OR NOT TO ESCAPE?, THAT IS THE QUESTION: AN EVALUATION OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE CRITO In this paper I will evaluate Crito's arguments for why Socrates should escape from prison and Socrates' arguments for why he should remain in prison and accept his death .Download