Firstly, it is noticeable that the basic responsibility of the government is to look after their society, especially for people living in under standard of life. Third, Third, a developing nation may become dependent on foreign aid.
On the other hand, people from many developing countries migrate to wealthy nations to study or to work. In conclusion, I believe it would be difficult to see any progress in the economy of developing countries without the cooperation of rich nations.
Or does it only help the rich country by keeping the poorer country dependent? After reckoning enough, I believe that rich or developed nations should share their wealth and resources with those inferior or poorer nations who are starveling and struggling with their system, because there will be a certain hard time which comes to everyone, so for the sake of humanity, such aid should be provided.
However, many rich countries also donate money for political or diplomatic reasons. This can be in the form of expensive specialized equipment and experts from the donor country.
Hence, the government should distribute this income in an appropriate way such as providing free educations and health facilities.
Otherwise, the nations will not have an adequate standard of life. The creation and diffusion of Should rich countries help the poor simple technical knowledge about health, hygiene, nutrition, organization and technologies has also played an important role.
Developed countries may not be bound by law to help poor nations, but they have the responsibility - and the power - to do so. They could use their power for their own advantage. In many areas, national ownership by citizens and state are vital. Write no less than words.
Second, allowing foreigners to have a significant influence on a nation could lead to negative consequences.
The needs of the poorer countries may seem obvious. They expanded their empire to include poor, resource-rich nations in Asia.
But some countries did not benefit from colonial rule. However, although our humanity makes us want to help eliminate poverty and suffering, we must examine the real needs of poor countries and implement solutions that will benefit both them and us.
On in all, the care of poorer nations is the main responsibility of the government.
It is wrong to allow outsiders to influence the development of a country. Policy coherence lacking This holistic approach to global development is the type of response envisaged by the Sustainable Development Goals SDGswhich the UK signed up to just last September.
The petition was recently debated by a packed room of MPs, the vast majority of whom lined up to defend UK aid spending, highlighting the positive impact it makes around the world.
The most crucial point made so far, although the wealthier nations should help the other voluntarily, the government are playing the significant role to solve this problem by deciding governmental decisions in terms of education and health.
UK aid is some of the most closely scrutinised in the world, by various parliamentary committees and independent external bodies.
Recognize international migration as an element of trade policy and a highly effective means of reducing poverty.
However, since those countries are buried into debts as a result of unbalances finances, Rich countries are more equipped to help fewer fortune nations than their own governments. Furthermore, much aid returns to the donor. For example, many immigrants to France and the UK have proved themselves in those countries by working hard.
Extremist and terrorist often recruit people, who are illiterate and have no conscience over anything.
Most citizens in developing nations live under the poverty line and, in my opinion, rich countries have the ability and should take up the responsibility of supporting them.
The Daily Mail in particular has aggressively pursued a campaign against the aid budget and mobilisedsupporters to sign a parliamentary petition calling for the 0.
For one thing, billions of dollars of aid often goes missing, into corrupt governments or inefficient administration. Poorer nations can learn how to improve basic and essential sectors of their society such as farming and agricultural technology.
There are many reasons for helping poor countries. We take a lot of things for granted. This could lead to corruption and financial loss in the less developed country. Reform global finance to stop the siphoning off of income and assets from poor countries to rich countries by corporations and national elites.Rethinking the Case for Helping Poor Countries.
development aid and to persuade the rich countries to spend far well governed given a bit of help from. foreign aid is the concept of poor people in wealthy countries giving money to rich people in poor countries.
rich countries give all sorts of money to poor countries. their voters are sold on the idea by people with dubious agendas. Jul 01, · Summary: Increasing aid and market access for poor countries makes sense but will not do that much good.
Wealthy nations should also push. Because rich countries have what they need, but poor countries don't. It is important that the rich countries help the developing ones so that the gap between LEDCs, and MEDs would be smaller.
Also, it is important that people in the developing countries to. Why should rich nations help the poor? Because, new book ‘Should Rich Nations Help the Poor income and assets from poor countries to rich countries by.
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Some people say that rich nations should help poor countries with their basic needs like food and education while others oppose the idea and argue that the poor nation themselves should try to improve their condition.Download